Alina Korneeva vs Lena Couto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Which player has an advantage in second serve points won? Korneeva, winning 39.18% compared to Couto's 33.86%.
• Couto outperforms Korneeva in return games, capturing 56.03% of opponents' second serves, surpassing Korneeva's 53.62%.
• Who excels in returning first serves? Korneeva, with a higher percentage of 37.5% against Couto's 32.28%.
• When under pressure, Couto has a slight edge, saving 48.28% of breakpoints compared to Korneeva's 42.42%.
• Korneeva has a stronger overall match performance, achieving a 55.56% win rate, whereas Couto trails with 11.76%.
• Korneeva's best surface is Hard courts with a 79% win rate, as opposed to Couto who excels on Clay with a 33% win rate.
• Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, where Korneeva has a 57.89% success rate, significantly better than Couto's 13.33%.
• In terms of opponent quality over the past year, Korneeva has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 196.7, compared to Couto's 300.82.
• Will it matter if this match reaches a deciding set? Yes, as Korneeva has a 38% success rate, unlike Couto’s 0% success in such scenarios.
• Break point conversion reflects Korneeva's edge, converting 43.21% of opportunities compared to Couto's 32.5%.

Editorial Prediction (July 20, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent statistics and overall performance, Korneeva enters this matchup with a distinct advantage. Her success in second serve points, first serve returns, and break point conversion suggests a more robust game under pressure. In contrast, Couto falls behind, especially in key areas that often dictate match outcomes.

Furthermore, Korneeva’s consistent performance against stronger opponents and her adaptability on Hard courts—the predicted surface for this match—highlight her as the likely front-runner.

Considering these factors, Korneeva is projected to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter, leveraging her statistical advantages and superior historical performance.